Mutability idea retracted

from blog baby steps, | ↗ original
I have been thinking a bit more about the approach to mutability I recently discussed. It seemed a bit too good to be true (too clean) and I think I’ve realized a problem. The problem derives from my definition of types: T = Q U Q = mut | const | imm U = [T] | @T | &T | { (f : T)* } | X | int | uint | ... The interesting case is...